Then, the messengers explained to people that all these representations are just tools in order to allow some men to avail other men (as we’ve corretly seen in class, most of the time representations are used in political ways in order to legitimate unfair situations). So the messengers said rationaly to people to don’t worship statuts or images because it’s just false representation of the reality, it’s just rocks or woods unable to hear something or to respond. So, God sent messengers because men began to worship statuts, images and finaly men. ![]() The point is that, for them, God is the only divinity who diserve adoration through differents forms, this is the central message of any God messengers. I’m sad to observe that most of the time western point of view don’t consider the very specific narrative beyond the prohibition of images in whatever forms it can embodied.Īs I said before, I’ve studied a little bit the relation between muslims iconoclasts and the images or representation and actually they have a very interested narrative in the act of condemn representations. ![]() I wanted to have your opinion about a specific subject I’ve studied in France, iconoclasm and law, and more peculiarly the Islam iconoclasm, law and narrative.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |